Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
biorxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.04.22.489083

ABSTRACT

As COVID-19 persists, severe acquired respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Variants of Concern (VOCs) emerge, accumulating spike (S) glycoprotein mutations. S receptor-binding domain (RBD) comprises a free fatty acid (FFA)-binding pocket. FFA-binding stabilizes a locked S conformation, interfering with virus infectivity. We provide evidence that the pocket is conserved in pathogenic {beta}-coronaviruses ({beta}-CoVs) infecting humans. SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 and VOCs bind the essential FFA linoleic acid (LA), while binding is abolished by one mutation in common cold-causing HCoV-HKU1. In the SARS-CoV S structure, LA stabilizes the locked conformation while the open, infectious conformation is LA-free. Electron tomography of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells reveals that LA-treatment inhibits viral replication, resulting in fewer, deformed virions. Our results establish FFA-binding as a hallmark of pathogenic {beta}-CoV infection and replication, highlighting potential antiviral strategies.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19
2.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.04.11.22273690

ABSTRACT

Saliva is easily obtainable non-invasively and potentially suitable for detecting both current and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. We established 6 standardised enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) capable of detecting IgA and IgG antibodies to whole SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, to its receptor binding domain region and to nucleocapsid protein in saliva. In test accuracy (n=320), we found that spike IgG performed best (ROC AUC: 95.0%, 92.8-97.3%), followed by spike IgA (ROC AUC: 89.9%, 86.5-93.2%) for discriminating between pre-pandemic and post COVID-19 saliva samples. Using machine learning, diagnostic performance was improved when a combination of tests was used. As expected, salivary IgA was poorly correlated with serum, indicating an oral mucosal response whereas salivary IgG responses were predictive of those in serum. When deployed to 20 household outbreaks undergoing Delta and Omicron infection, antibody responses were heterogeneous but remained a reliable indicator of recent infection. Intriguingly, unvaccinated children showed evidence of exposure almost exclusively through specific IgA responses in the absence of evidence of viral infection. We have provided robust standardisation, evaluation, and field-testing of salivary antibody assays as tools for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 immune responses. Future work should focus on investigating salivary antibody responses following infection and vaccination to understand patterns of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and inform ongoing vaccination strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Virus Diseases
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL